Quinten Metsys
(Leuven 1466–1530 Antwerp)
Christ Blessing
oil and mordant gilding on oak panel
37.6 x 30.4 cm (14¾ x 12 in.)
c. 1491–1505
‘Metsys shows a more beautiful world, the extraordinary world of saints and holy figures, as a contrast to the grotesque faces of everyday sinfulness.’
Larry Silver, The Paintings of Quinten Massys with Catalogue Raisonné, London 1984, p. 25
Artwork details
Quinten Metsys was born in 1466 in Leuven, modern-day Belgium, and was the son of a blacksmith and clockmaker.1 No records concerning his early life or training have survived and questions remain about his formative years. An account in verse of his life by Dominicus Lampsonius (1532–1599) attests that Metsys initially trained as a blacksmith, like his father but that his romantic pursuit of a woman swayed him to the profession of painting, because she preferred the silence of the brush to the noise of hammering.2 Karel van Mander (1548–1606) claimed that Metsys was self-taught, an improbable statement considering the rigid guild system of apprenticeship prevailing in the Netherlands at that time.3 Unfortunately, records of the painters’ guild in Leuven are not preserved before 1494, and as a result, Metsys’ training is a matter of conjecture. One possibility is that he was apprenticed in the workshops of the Bouts family, the leading painters in Leuven at that time, although his earliest work seems more indebted to the Bruges school of painting led by Hans Memling (1430–1494). Metsys is recorded as living in Antwerp in 1491 when he registered with the Guild of Saint Luke.4
Antwerp was a flourishing trade centre and the heart of artistic exchange in the Southern Netherlands, attracting wealthy patrons and artists.5 As a painter of portraits, small panels for private devotional use as well as altarpieces, Metsys’ work was in high demand. It is known that he took on apprentices—four are documented between 1495 and 1510. By the 1520s, he owned two large townhouses, testament to his success. Metsys’ first wife Alyt van Tuylt died in 1507, leaving him three children. He remarried the following year and had 10 more children.6
In his religious works, Metsys’ adherence to the Southern Netherlandish artistic tradition is particularly evident.7 His compositions reflect a profound engagement with the work of his predecessors, while at the same time drawing on his own innovative approach. In the present Christ Blessing, Metsys responds directly to the treatment of the same subject by Robert Campin (c. 1375–1444) of about 1424, as well as the Ghent Altarpiece of 1432 by Jan van Eyck (1390–1441). Metsys painted this exquisitely detailed and extraordinarily well-preserved panel of Christ Blessing during his time in Antwerp in the 1490s. It stands as a prime example of Metsys’ naturalistic style. Christ’s piercing gaze and the three-dimensional rendering of his left hand command the viewer’s attention, while a sense of spiritual transcendence is conveyed by the golden setting and intricate details such as the ‘beaded’ strokes of his eyelashes invite the viewer to linger and marvel. This composition of Christ Blessing is widely accepted as the earliest autograph treatment of the subject, on which subsequent versions by the artist and his workshop depend.
In stark contrast to this, Metsys’ secular paintings use realism to spark satire rather than spirituality. As well as humour, these works are lauded for their attention to detail, vivid colouring and the fantastical expressions of their characters.8 Drawing on the popular ‘farce’ plays performed by the rederijkers, a literary faction of the Guild of Saint Luke,9 Metsys painted grotesque characters engaged in compromising activities, such as The Moneylender and His Wife of 1514, or more famously, An Old Woman (‘The Ugly Duchess’) of 1513. The existence of a nearly identical drawing from Leonardo da Vinci’s studio has sparked ongoing debate over whether the original concept belonged to Metsys or Leonardo.10 Regardless of who influenced whom, the similarity confirms a vibrant artistic exchange between Italy and Northern Europe in the early sixteenth century. 11 Apart from their shared interest in ‘grotesque’ heads, Metsys religious works and also this Christ Blessing, radiate an atmospheric mysticism akin to the aura that Leonardo created in his paintings.12
One of the most influential painters at the turn of the 16th century, Metsys’ imaginative work continues to inspire artists and art lovers alike. Already in the 17th century, his reputation was unsurpassed, and he was recognised as the founder of the Antwerp school of painting.13 After his death in 1530, his sons Cornelis (c. 1510–by 1557) and Jan (c. 1509–1575) continued to produce works in his style, likely taking over their father’s workshop.14
1 Please note there are many different spellings of this artist’s name. The most common versions of his first name can be Quinten or Quentin, and of his last name Metsys, Massys or Massijs. For example, the National Gallery in London, the Koninklijk Museum voor Schone Kunsten in Antwerp and the Art Institute of Chicago all use different variants.
2 H. Hondius the Elder, Pictorum aliquot celebrium, præcipué Germaniæ Inferioris, effigies, The Hague 1610, accessed through the Courtauld’s Picturing the Netherlandish Canon online project, https://sites.courtauld.ac.uk/netherlandish-canon/image-and-tombstone/.
3 K. van Mander, Het Groot Schilderboeck, Haarlem 1604, fol. 215v.
4 L. Silver, The Paintings of Quinten Massys with Catalogue Raisonné, London 1984, p. 3.
5 J.C. Hutchison, ‘Metsys, Quinten [Quentin; Quentinus Mesius]’, Grove Art Online, 2003, https://doi-org.lonlib.idm.oclc.org/10.1093/oao/9781884446054.013.90000370687.
6 Silver 1984, p. 4.
7 Hutchison 2003.
8 ‘Metsys, Quentin or Matsys, Massys, Messys, Metzys; called Quentin de Smit’, Benezit Dictionary of Artists, 31 October 2011, https://doi-org.lonlib.idm.oclc.org/10.1093/benz/9780199773787.article.B00121547.
9 L. Silver, ‘Power and self: a new-found “Old man” by Massys’, Simiolus: Netherlandish Quarterly for the History of Art, 9, no. 2, 1977, p. 91.
10 M. Brown, ‘Solved: mystery of The Ugly Duchess – and the Da Vinci connection’, The Guardian, 11 October 2008; R. Brooks, ‘“She is a he”: Was an Old Woman, the painting that inspired Alice’s Duchess, actually a man?’, The Guardian, 11 March 2023, https://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/2023/mar/11/she-is-a-he-was-an-old-woman-painting-alice-duchess-a-man.
11 Silver 1984, p. 7.
For the most recent research on An Old Woman (‘The Ugly Duchess’), see E. Capron, The Ugly Duchess: Beauty and Satire in the Renaissance, London 2023.
12 Hutchison 2003.
13 Silver 1984, p. 2.
14 J. Van der Stock, ‘Massys, Jan’, Grove Art Online, 2003, https://doi-org.lonlib.idm.oclc.org/10.1093/oao/9781884446054.013.90000370688.
Possibly in the private collection of William IV, King of England (1765–1837), at Bushy House;
Presumably thence to his illegitimate son by the actress Dorothy Jordan, the Revd Lord Augustus Fitzclarence (1805–1854);
Presumably thence to his daughter, Dorothea Fitzclarence (1845–1869), who married Thomas William Goff, of Oakport, Roscommon, Ireland;
Their son, Major Thomas Clarence Edward Goff (1867–1949), by whom given in May 1940 to Holy Trinity Church, Bradford-on-Avon;
From whom acquired by an English private collector in 2013;
From whom acquired through Sotheby’s, London, by a private collector, Hong Kong, by 2016;
From whom acquired through Christie’s, London, by The Klesch Collection.
Unexhibited
K. Stainer-Hutchins, S. Watney and H. Platt, ‘A rediscovered prototype by Quinten Metsys: ‘Christ blessing with the Virgin in adoration’’, The Burlington Magazine, vol. 152, no. 1283, February 2010, pp. 76–81, figs 1, 3, 4 and 5;
K. Stainer-Hutchins and H. Platt, ‘Christ Blessing with The Virgin In Adoration By Quentin Metsys, c. 1491–1505: A Technical Investigation’, The Picture Restorer, 37, Autumn 2010, pp. 18–21, 29–33;
Campbell, National Gallery Catalogues: The Sixteenth Century Netherlandish Paintings: With French Paintings before 1600, vol. II, London, 2014, pp. 477–78 and 479 n. 19, fig. 12;
T.-H. Borchert, ‘Ars devotionis: Reinventing the Icon in Early Netherlandish Painting’, in B. Coulie (ed.), Paths to Europe: From Byzantium to the Low Countries, Brussels 2017, pp. 43 and 45, fig. 13.
If you would like to use this image for educational purposes, please contact us.
Quinten Metsys
(Leuven 1466–1530 Antwerp)
Christ Blessing
oil and mordant gilding on oak panel
37.6 x 30.4 cm (14 ¾ x 12 in.)
c. 1491–1505
‘Metsys shows a more beautiful world, the extraordinary world of saints and holy figures, as a contrast to the grotesque faces of everyday sinfulness.’
Larry Silver, The Paintings of Quinten Massys with Catalogue Raisonné, London 1984, p. 25
Artwork details
Quinten Metsys was born in 1466 in Leuven, modern-day Belgium, and was the son of a blacksmith and clockmaker.1 No records concerning his early life or training have survived and questions remain about his formative years. An account in verse of his life by Dominicus Lampsonius (1532–1599) attests that Metsys initially trained as a blacksmith, like his father but that his romantic pursuit of a woman swayed him to the profession of painting, because she preferred the silence of the brush to the noise of hammering.2 Karel van Mander (1548–1606) claimed that Metsys was self-taught, an improbable statement considering the rigid guild system of apprenticeship prevailing in the Netherlands at that time.3 Unfortunately, records of the painters’ guild in Leuven are not preserved before 1494, and as a result, Metsys’ training is a matter of conjecture. One possibility is that he was apprenticed in the workshops of the Bouts family, the leading painters in Leuven at that time, although his earliest work seems more indebted to the Bruges school of painting led by Hans Memling (1430–1494). Metsys is recorded as living in Antwerp in 1491 when he registered with the Guild of Saint Luke.4
Antwerp was a flourishing trade centre and the heart of artistic exchange in the Southern Netherlands, attracting wealthy patrons and artists.5 As a painter of portraits, small panels for private devotional use as well as altarpieces, Metsys’ work was in high demand. It is known that he took on apprentices—four are documented between 1495 and 1510. By the 1520s, he owned two large townhouses, testament to his success. Metsys’ first wife Alyt van Tuylt died in 1507, leaving him three children. He remarried the following year and had 10 more children.6
In his religious works, Metsys’ adherence to the Southern Netherlandish artistic tradition is particularly evident.7 His compositions reflect a profound engagement with the work of his predecessors, while at the same time drawing on his own innovative approach. In the present Christ Blessing, Metsys responds directly to the treatment of the same subject by Robert Campin (c. 1375–1444) of about 1424, as well as the Ghent Altarpiece of 1432 by Jan van Eyck (1390–1441). Metsys painted this exquisitely detailed and extraordinarily well-preserved panel of Christ Blessing during his time in Antwerp in the 1490s. It stands as a prime example of Metsys’ naturalistic style. Christ’s piercing gaze and the three-dimensional rendering of his left hand command the viewer’s attention, while a sense of spiritual transcendence is conveyed by the golden setting and intricate details such as the ‘beaded’ strokes of his eyelashes invite the viewer to linger and marvel. This composition of Christ Blessing is widely accepted as the earliest autograph treatment of the subject, on which subsequent versions by the artist and his workshop depend.
In stark contrast to this, Metsys’ secular paintings use realism to spark satire rather than spirituality. As well as humour, these works are lauded for their attention to detail, vivid colouring and the fantastical expressions of their characters.8 Drawing on the popular ‘farce’ plays performed by the rederijkers, a literary faction of the Guild of Saint Luke,9 Metsys painted grotesque characters engaged in compromising activities, such as The Moneylender and His Wife of 1514, or more famously, An Old Woman (‘The Ugly Duchess’) of 1513. The existence of a nearly identical drawing from Leonardo da Vinci’s studio has sparked ongoing debate over whether the original concept belonged to Metsys or Leonardo.10 Regardless of who influenced whom, the similarity confirms a vibrant artistic exchange between Italy and Northern Europe in the early sixteenth century. 11 Apart from their shared interest in ‘grotesque’ heads, Metsys religious works and also this Christ Blessing, radiate an atmospheric mysticism akin to the aura that Leonardo created in his paintings.12
One of the most influential painters at the turn of the 16th century, Metsys’ imaginative work continues to inspire artists and art lovers alike. Already in the 17th century, his reputation was unsurpassed, and he was recognised as the founder of the Antwerp school of painting.13 After his death in 1530, his sons Cornelis (c. 1510–by 1557) and Jan (c. 1509–1575) continued to produce works in his style, likely taking over their father’s workshop.14
1 Please note there are many different spellings of this artist’s name. The most common versions of his first name can be Quinten or Quentin, and of his last name Metsys, Massys or Massijs. For example, the National Gallery in London, the Koninklijk Museum voor Schone Kunsten in Antwerp and the Art Institute of Chicago all use different variants.
2 H. Hondius the Elder, Pictorum aliquot celebrium, præcipué Germaniæ Inferioris, effigies, The Hague 1610, accessed through the Courtauld’s Picturing the Netherlandish Canon online project, https://sites.courtauld.ac.uk/netherlandish-canon/image-and-tombstone/.
3 K. van Mander, Het Groot Schilderboeck, Haarlem 1604, fol. 215v.
4 L. Silver, The Paintings of Quinten Massys with Catalogue Raisonné, London 1984, p. 3.
5 J.C. Hutchison, ‘Metsys, Quinten [Quentin; Quentinus Mesius]’, Grove Art Online, 2003, https://doi-org.lonlib.idm.oclc.org/10.1093/oao/9781884446054.013.90000370687.
6 Silver 1984, p. 4.
7 Hutchison 2003.
8 ‘Metsys, Quentin or Matsys, Massys, Messys, Metzys; called Quentin de Smit’, Benezit Dictionary of Artists, 31 October 2011, https://doi-org.lonlib.idm.oclc.org/10.1093/benz/9780199773787.article.B00121547.
9 L. Silver, ‘Power and self: a new-found “Old man” by Massys’, Simiolus: Netherlandish Quarterly for the History of Art, 9, no. 2, 1977, p. 91.
10 M. Brown, ‘Solved: mystery of The Ugly Duchess – and the Da Vinci connection’, The Guardian, 11 October 2008; R. Brooks, ‘“She is a he”: Was an Old Woman, the painting that inspired Alice’s Duchess, actually a man?’, The Guardian, 11 March 2023, https://www.theguardian.com/artanddesign/2023/mar/11/she-is-a-he-was-an-old-woman-painting-alice-duchess-a-man.
11 Silver 1984, p. 7.
For the most recent research on An Old Woman (‘The Ugly Duchess’), see E. Capron, The Ugly Duchess: Beauty and Satire in the Renaissance, London 2023.
12 Hutchison 2003.
13 Silver 1984, p. 2.
14 J. Van der Stock, ‘Massys, Jan’, Grove Art Online, 2003, https://doi-org.lonlib.idm.oclc.org/10.1093/oao/9781884446054.013.90000370688.
Possibly in the private collection of William IV, King of England (1765–1837), at Bushy House;
Presumably thence to his illegitimate son by the actress Dorothy Jordan, the Revd Lord Augustus Fitzclarence (1805–1854);
Presumably thence to his daughter, Dorothea Fitzclarence (1845–1869), who married Thomas William Goff, of Oakport, Roscommon, Ireland;
Their son, Major Thomas Clarence Edward Goff (1867–1949), by whom given in May 1940 to Holy Trinity Church, Bradford-on-Avon;
From whom acquired by an English private collector in 2013;
From whom acquired through Sotheby’s, London, by a private collector, Hong Kong, by 2016;
From whom acquired through Christie’s, London, by The Klesch Collection.
Unexhibited
K. Stainer-Hutchins, S. Watney and H. Platt, ‘A rediscovered prototype by Quinten Metsys: ‘Christ blessing with the Virgin in adoration’’, The Burlington Magazine, vol. 152, no. 1283, February 2010, pp. 76–81, figs 1, 3, 4 and 5;
K. Stainer-Hutchins and H. Platt, ‘Christ Blessing with The Virgin In Adoration By Quentin Metsys, c. 1491–1505: A Technical Investigation’, The Picture Restorer, 37, Autumn 2010, pp. 18–21, 29–33;
Campbell, National Gallery Catalogues: The Sixteenth Century Netherlandish Paintings: With French Paintings before 1600, vol. II, London, 2014, pp. 477–78 and 479 n. 19, fig. 12;
T.-H. Borchert, ‘Ars devotionis: Reinventing the Icon in Early Netherlandish Painting’, in B. Coulie (ed.), Paths to Europe: From Byzantium to the Low Countries, Brussels 2017, pp. 43 and 45, fig. 13.
If you would like to use this image for educational purposes, please contact us.

